On complementing end-to-end human behavior predictors with planning

Liting Sun (UC Berkeley),
Xiaogang Jia (UC Berkeley),
Anca Dragan (UC Berkeley)
Paper Website
Paper #037
Interactive Poster Session III Interactive Poster Session VI

0d 00h 00m

0d 00h 00m


High capacity end-to-end approaches for human motion (behavior) prediction have the ability to represent subtle nuances in human behavior, but struggle with robustness to out of distribution inputs and tail events. Planning-based prediction, on the other hand, can reliably output decent-but-not-great predictions: it is much more stable in the face of distribution shift (as we verify in this work), but it has high inductive bias, missing important aspects that drive human decisions, and ignoring cognitive biases that make human behavior suboptimal. In this work, we analyze one family of approaches that strive to get the best of both worlds: use the end-to-end predictor on common cases, but do not rely on it for tail events / out-of-distribution inputs — switch to the planning-based predictor there. We contribute an analysis of different approaches for detecting when to make this switch, using an autonomous driving domain. We find that promising approaches based on ensembling or generative modeling of the training distribution might not be reliable, but that there very simple methods which can perform surprisingly well — including training a classifier to pick up on tell-tale issues in predicted trajectories.

Spotlight Presentation

Previous Paper Paper Website Next Paper